500 Companies
20,000 divisions and subsidiaries
$20 trillion dollars of turnover
Every year this exclusive group of the worlds biggest companies buys $740bn of Telecoms services.
Ever wondered where the Fortune Global 500 spend that colossal telecoms budget? BackChannel has been busy finding out.
In the new year we will start to reveal all...
Tuesday, November 29, 2011
Thursday, June 30, 2011
Virtual Machine Company Server replacements lower cost of service delivery
These guys are starting to pop up a lot in the UK. Their Hyper-dense virtualization appliance is a turnkey replacement for commodity servers and being able to run more VMs in less power and cooling is a great message for these tough times in the hosting world. Worth a look
Virtual Machine Company announces next-generation virtualization appliances
The following release was sent today to coincide with the release of our latest range of Hyper-dense server virtualization appliances
Built around the latest AMD 12-core processors, with highly-optimised RAM options up to 512 gigabytes, and fast and cool solid-state storage, the two new servers can host unprecedented numbers of virtual machines running the most demanding commercial computing applications.
The new VMC appliances use less power, require fewer software licenses, and take up less rack-space space than anything else on the market.
For example, a mid-range 24 Core, 192 Gb RAM VMC virtualization appliance comfortably accommodates 50 or more virtual machines running processor and memory-intensive applications of the kind usually confined to non-virtual environments; tasks such as rendering video, enterprise-scale databases, and huge FTP batch operations. All of this while consuming less than 307 watts (1.43 amps) at peak loading. Average power consumption for competitor machines delivering this much firepower is more than 900 watts.
VMC Appliances are available in through VMC's exclusive distributor, Computerlinks http://www.computerlinks.co.uk/
Whois Lookup
Zip Code Maps
Virtual Machine Company announces next-generation virtualization appliances
The following release was sent today to coincide with the release of our latest range of Hyper-dense server virtualization appliances
- outperforms all current commercial and custom-built servers in independent Geekbench power and performance testing1
- comfortably runs more virtual machines and delivers class-leading savings on energy, cooling, software licensing, and datacentre real estate
- the worlds fastest, most cost-effective, and environmentally-friendly commercial computing platform
April 12, 2011 Cambridge, UK
The Virtual Machine Company (VMC) today announced the launch of the next generation of its server virtualization appliances.Built around the latest AMD 12-core processors, with highly-optimised RAM options up to 512 gigabytes, and fast and cool solid-state storage, the two new servers can host unprecedented numbers of virtual machines running the most demanding commercial computing applications.
The new VMC appliances use less power, require fewer software licenses, and take up less rack-space space than anything else on the market.
For example, a mid-range 24 Core, 192 Gb RAM VMC virtualization appliance comfortably accommodates 50 or more virtual machines running processor and memory-intensive applications of the kind usually confined to non-virtual environments; tasks such as rendering video, enterprise-scale databases, and huge FTP batch operations. All of this while consuming less than 307 watts (1.43 amps) at peak loading. Average power consumption for competitor machines delivering this much firepower is more than 900 watts.
Virtual Machine Company Head of R&D, Nick Hutton, said:
This is exciting, high-performance computing meets boring stability and cost-effectiveness. The top of the Geekbench league table is usually dominated by "custom rigs" built by clever enthusiasts or researchers. I am proud of our development team for productising and normalising unrivalled power and performance with such impressive stability and economy.
AMD Head of Commercial Marketing EMEA, Stefano Chiavegati, commented:We developed the AMD Opteron 6100 Series processor to meet 21st Century commercial computing demands for the optimum balance between power, reliability, cost and environmental considerations. The Virtual Machine Companys Server Virtualization Appliances tick all of those boxes and more.
1 http://browse.geekbench.ca/geekbench2/topFewer software licences
VMware requires an expensive licence for every pair of processors. Because the new VMC virtualisation appliances use AMDs processor core-dense CPUs, the licence-to-virtual-machine ratio becomes much more favourable. For example, when virtualising an estate of 240 servers running Windows Server, one customer saved an additional £180,000 in year-one capital expenditure by using VMC Virtualisation Appliances to deliver a hyper-dense solution.Models and configurations
Two standard appliances are available with additional configuration options- VA 1200 Series Server Virtualization Appliance: 1U, Dual Processor 24 Core minimum configuration 64GB RAM
- VA 2400 Series Server Virtualization Appliance: 2U, Dual Processor 48 Core minimum configuration 128GB RAM
- For detailed technical specifications please visit: www.virtualmachineco.com/virtualization_appliances.htm
Pricing and availability
The new VMC 1200 Series Appliance is available immediately with a base configuration price of £9,500. The VMC 2400 Series Appliance will ship at 2011 with prices starting at £15,500.VMC Appliances are available in through VMC's exclusive distributor, Computerlinks http://www.computerlinks.co.uk/
Support
Five-year, next business day on-site and 24 x 7 support contracts are available.Whois Lookup
Zip Code Maps
Thursday, June 16, 2011
Orange Huawei so good you pay for it twice!
Sorry for the lack of recent posts but we're up to our ears in the latest development project - A complete profile of the Fortune Global 500. We are busy profiling the telecoms & IP services used by the 325,000 companies, subsidiary companies and regional offices that make up the index.
But I couldn;t let this one pass.
Well here is a great story on TelecomTV. Huawei and Orange are offering a Signal Booster service on all the new Huawei Android phones that switches the cellular traffic out via your wifi, so if you have no phone signal in the house you can still use your mobile... Genius you cry!!
Except it's not - you have to pay for the call, at your normal network rate even though you are using your own broadband connection saving Orange a packet (sic).
I use Skype, a lot, and when I am in the house I route my DDI calls to the Skype on my iPhone and I make international calls outbound same way.
Give it a go it works a treat
But I couldn;t let this one pass.
Well here is a great story on TelecomTV. Huawei and Orange are offering a Signal Booster service on all the new Huawei Android phones that switches the cellular traffic out via your wifi, so if you have no phone signal in the house you can still use your mobile... Genius you cry!!
Except it's not - you have to pay for the call, at your normal network rate even though you are using your own broadband connection saving Orange a packet (sic).
I use Skype, a lot, and when I am in the house I route my DDI calls to the Skype on my iPhone and I make international calls outbound same way.
Give it a go it works a treat
Tuesday, March 29, 2011
Further disruption to Middle-East Internet Services
Interruptions to Middle Eastern Internet services seem to be a bit of a theme over the last few years; but when you actually look at the maps of the undersea networks in the area you get to see something of the scale of the difficulty. In the same way as virtually all trade with the East used to go through the old Silk Route the modern day equivalent is a cluster of submarine cable systems in and around the Red and Arabian Seas.
Here are very few submarine cable maps that you might find interesting.
SUBMARINE CABLE AND EQUINIX DATA CENTER MAP 2010
Labels:
cable maps,
internet,
middle east,
submarine cables
Monday, March 28, 2011
Experience with Cloud Computing after earthquake in Japan
While the Email and Web servers of local governments in the effected areas of Japan went down last month, government staff utilised Social Media technologies on the cloud, such as Twitter, Facebook and Google, to communicate with Japanese citizens.
The resiliency and the effectiveness of these Cloud providers in sustaining and enabling collaboration has been pretty impressive in enabling communications in very difficult circumstances and has done a lot to boost peoples positive view of Cloud services. Whether it is Japanese Government officials using Twitter from their mobiles, or Libyans using dial up Modems to access Facebook.
Lately I have read a number of comments suggesting that it is the resiliency of the Cloud that has been the facilitator, it hasn't it is the underlying architecture of the Internet.
Internet is Internet; a global IP based network, resilient self healing and designed to survive a global nuclear war. On top of which IP has had over 45 years of open development through groups like the IETF.
Cloud however is a philosophy of moving services to a more cost effective shared infrastructure where you gain the advantages economies of scale available there. At the moment what most people talk about as Cloud are a series of commercial services accessible over the Internet, developed to varying levels of resilience and vulnerable to influences such as the financial failure of the provider, the law, change in corporate direction; EMC briefly switched off their Atmos storage cloud service last year, before reopening it again almost immediately.
Whilst it is true that Twitter/Facebook etc are well managed, backed up, accessible and generally robust . We are a long way from the reality of bespoke Cloud delivered services for business that cannot be disrupted, switched off or simply become inaccessible.
Cloud however is a philosophy of moving services to a more cost effective shared infrastructure where you gain the advantages economies of scale available there. At the moment what most people talk about as Cloud are a series of commercial services accessible over the Internet, developed to varying levels of resilience and vulnerable to influences such as the financial failure of the provider, the law, change in corporate direction; EMC briefly switched off their Atmos storage cloud service last year, before reopening it again almost immediately.
Whilst it is true that Twitter/Facebook etc are well managed, backed up, accessible and generally robust . We are a long way from the reality of bespoke Cloud delivered services for business that cannot be disrupted, switched off or simply become inaccessible.
Wednesday, February 02, 2011
Hosted email security: The 2011 market report - Now in it's 5th year
Your opportunity to find out who's using these services, who's winning market share and who's falling behind.
Now in it's 5th year BackChannel's flagship survey has been expanded again to cover the use of hosted email hygiene services amongst a million organisations & businesses in 17 key countries.
The reports covers 40+ service providers including all your favourites; Messagelabs, Microsoft, Google/Postini, Webroot and many localised service providers you may not have heard.
It's been an interesting and turbulent year find out who's up, who's down and whether those $100s of millions spent on acquisitions in this sector are paying off.
A must read for executives, investors and any business involved in the delivery or purchase of email security products and services.
Interested in sourcing a copy then drop me a mail and either me or one of the BackChannel team will get back to you.
Now in it's 5th year BackChannel's flagship survey has been expanded again to cover the use of hosted email hygiene services amongst a million organisations & businesses in 17 key countries.
The reports covers 40+ service providers including all your favourites; Messagelabs, Microsoft, Google/Postini, Webroot and many localised service providers you may not have heard.
It's been an interesting and turbulent year find out who's up, who's down and whether those $100s of millions spent on acquisitions in this sector are paying off.
A must read for executives, investors and any business involved in the delivery or purchase of email security products and services.
Interested in sourcing a copy then drop me a mail and either me or one of the BackChannel team will get back to you.
Labels:
google,
managed services,
messagelabs,
mimecast,
postini,
retarus,
symantec cloud,
trendmicro,
webroot
Tuesday, January 18, 2011
LTE promises 100Mbps mobile handset, with 180 operators investing in 70 countries
LTE, or Long Term Evolution, will hopefully lead us to That state of ubiquitous of connected Nirvana at some point; but don't hold your breath. Verizon in the US is delivering an average of 8Mbps in some urban areas.
But as tha GSA (Global mobile Suppliers Association) reports 180 operators investing in LTE in 70 countries and the EU Government promising to invest in an LTE infrastructure for Europe, maybe we could all be using up our 5Gb a month data allowance in a single morning rather sooner than you might think.
Research from GSA Updated 'Evolution to LTE' report published has confirmed LTE as the fastest developing system in the history of mobile telecommunications.
LTE operator commitments are developing faster than they did for HSPA, which until now had been the fastest developing mobile communications system.
The report confirms 128 firm operator commitments to deploy commercial LTE systems in 52 countries, and a further 52 “pre-commitment” trials or pilots in an additional 18 countries.
The report covers both LTE FDD and LTE TDD modes.
The number of operators investing in LTE in deployments or trials has increased by more than 140% over the past 12 months. The number of countries where LTE systems are deployed or planned has increased by 85% in the same period.
It's anticipated that at least 64 LTE networks will be in commercial service by end 2012, according to the report.
The LTE eco-system is rapidly developing. User devices are now coming into the market in increasing numbers and addressing all product segments including USB modems/dongles, PC cards, routers, personal WiFi hotspots, smartphones, tablets, gaming devices, and more.
The report covers both LTE FDD and LTE TDD modes.
The number of operators investing in LTE in deployments or trials has increased by more than 140% over the past 12 months. The number of countries where LTE systems are deployed or planned has increased by 85% in the same period.
It's anticipated that at least 64 LTE networks will be in commercial service by end 2012, according to the report.
The LTE eco-system is rapidly developing. User devices are now coming into the market in increasing numbers and addressing all product segments including USB modems/dongles, PC cards, routers, personal WiFi hotspots, smartphones, tablets, gaming devices, and more.
All I can say is sooner the better at the moment most of the world is stuck in a halfway house where mobile devices show massive promise but all to often just don't deliver the goods.
Sunday, January 16, 2011
Start the New Year with a little light rock
Here at BackChannel we hope everyone's new year is off to a great start.
I thought we'd start off as we mean to go on with a little light entertainment.
Not exactly music of the spheres, more music of the servers. But, very entertaining.
This year we are researching the use of Virtualisation Technologies in commercial datacentres. So say tuned...
Labels:
hosted VMs,
managed services,
Market data,
virtual servers
Monday, December 20, 2010
Seasons Greetings
We're closing down for Christmas on the 23rd and will be back at our posts on the 4th of January, 2011. We'd like to take this opportunity to say thank you to everyone for their support this year and to wish you all a very merry Christmas.
Personalize funny videos and birthday eCards at JibJab!
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
Demand for Colocation outstripping demand
As co-location requirements soar providers are struggling to keep up with demand.
New data from TeleGeography’s Colocation Database reveal that colocation service providers are struggling to keep up with demand. Despite significant new construction, colocation site capacity is more constrained in 2010 than it was in 2009. More than 41% of sites surveyed by TeleGeography were at least 80% full at mid-2010, up from 34% of sites a year earlier.
Among the worst hit areas are London and the South of England, where surging power costs and a squeeze on physical space are causing colocation costs to rocket. With wholesales power costs set to raise 13% over the next year and potentially over 100% before the end of the decade. The use of power efficient data-centre equipment is going to be critical to the ability of service providers to compete.
Happily our new range of Virtualization Appliances are over 30% more efficient than the average data-centre server
New data from TeleGeography’s Colocation Database reveal that colocation service providers are struggling to keep up with demand. Despite significant new construction, colocation site capacity is more constrained in 2010 than it was in 2009. More than 41% of sites surveyed by TeleGeography were at least 80% full at mid-2010, up from 34% of sites a year earlier. Among the worst hit areas are London and the South of England, where surging power costs and a squeeze on physical space are causing colocation costs to rocket. With wholesales power costs set to raise 13% over the next year and potentially over 100% before the end of the decade. The use of power efficient data-centre equipment is going to be critical to the ability of service providers to compete.
Happily our new range of Virtualization Appliances are over 30% more efficient than the average data-centre server
Labels:
cloud,
Cloud Computing,
colocate,
colocation,
energy,
power
Tuesday, May 25, 2010
ePrivacy - overlooking the technicals
As we normally confine ourselves to issues surrounding Data and IP related telephony I had quite forgotten about this:
On 14 April 2009 the European Commission launched an infringement proceeding against the UK concerning incorrect transposition in UK law of EU law requirements concerning confidentiality of communications provided in the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC and the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC concerning user consent, sanctions in case of infringements and independent authority to supervise interception activities. On 29 October, further to analysis of the UK authorities' response to the letter of formal notice, the Commission proceeded to the next stage of the Reasoned Opinion.
The bottom line is that "There is no legal requirement for UK mobile customers using pre-paid cards (‘pay as you go’ customers) to register with their operators."
It was only this weeks announcements about the scrapping of the much hated ID cards here in the UK that reminded me.
Not usually one for infringement of civil liberties - I think this is wrong-headed, there are plenty of ways of 99% positively identifying an individual ; passports, drivers licenses, credit cards et al. ID cards were just a 'doomed from birth' knee-jerk reaction to 9/11and given that contracts worth over £1bn possibly some fierce lobbying. But, untraceable mobile communications are a standard tool of the underworld, from your friendly neighbourhood 'hoody' drug dealers to international terrorists and every shade in between; and isn;t it just bizarre that as countries like Mexico and Brazil are moving to force registration of all mobile devices, 'uber-liberal' Europe is going the other way?!
Bit like the economy :-(
On 14 April 2009 the European Commission launched an infringement proceeding against the UK concerning incorrect transposition in UK law of EU law requirements concerning confidentiality of communications provided in the ePrivacy Directive 2002/58/EC and the Data Protection Directive 95/46/EC concerning user consent, sanctions in case of infringements and independent authority to supervise interception activities. On 29 October, further to analysis of the UK authorities' response to the letter of formal notice, the Commission proceeded to the next stage of the Reasoned Opinion.
The bottom line is that "There is no legal requirement for UK mobile customers using pre-paid cards (‘pay as you go’ customers) to register with their operators."
It was only this weeks announcements about the scrapping of the much hated ID cards here in the UK that reminded me.
Not usually one for infringement of civil liberties - I think this is wrong-headed, there are plenty of ways of 99% positively identifying an individual ; passports, drivers licenses, credit cards et al. ID cards were just a 'doomed from birth' knee-jerk reaction to 9/11and given that contracts worth over £1bn possibly some fierce lobbying. But, untraceable mobile communications are a standard tool of the underworld, from your friendly neighbourhood 'hoody' drug dealers to international terrorists and every shade in between; and isn;t it just bizarre that as countries like Mexico and Brazil are moving to force registration of all mobile devices, 'uber-liberal' Europe is going the other way?!
Bit like the economy :-(
Labels:
mobile content,
mobile data,
regulation,
telecommunications,
VoIP
Tuesday, April 20, 2010
Another Mediterranean cable cut disrupts Internet Traffic
Good post regarding the current outage of the SeaMeWe-4 submarine cable, from our friends over at Telegeography - purveyors of fine mapping, graphics, data, etc.
The Middle Easts overworked networks rely on just one major connection to the Web – an underwater cable known as “Sea-ME-We 4” that runs from Europe to the UAE and was last week accidentally severed in the Mediterranean Sea.
The damaged cable carries the majority of the regions internet traffic today but according to Stephan Beckert Director of Research at Telegeography this will drop to around 40% by the end of 2010 as more capacity comes on line.
The Middle Easts overworked networks rely on just one major connection to the Web – an underwater cable known as “Sea-ME-We 4” that runs from Europe to the UAE and was last week accidentally severed in the Mediterranean Sea.
The damaged cable carries the majority of the regions internet traffic today but according to Stephan Beckert Director of Research at Telegeography this will drop to around 40% by the end of 2010 as more capacity comes on line.
Friday, March 26, 2010
Mobile data traffic overtakes voice for first time
Ericsson reports that traffic generated from 400m mobile data/broadband subscribers is now more than from the 4.6Billion voice users with the traffic crossover at about 140,000 Terrabytes a month.
In terms of the financial implications, Informa Telecoms & Media predicted in January that mobile data revenues will surge to $330 billion by 2013, up from an estimated $208 billion in 2008. more
In terms of the financial implications, Informa Telecoms & Media predicted in January that mobile data revenues will surge to $330 billion by 2013, up from an estimated $208 billion in 2008. more
Labels:
broadband,
mobile content,
mobile data,
wifi,
wimax
Tuesday, March 23, 2010
UK Government to push ahead for Superfast Broadband but for when?
Further pronouncements on the eventual roll out of 'Super-Fast' 40-100Mb broadband to every home in the land were made by both major this week. As the UK heads relentlessly towards a General Election in the Spring, both government and opposition have alighted on this 'utility' as a vote winner / chance to bash the other.
But note the confusion over dates 2012 / 2017 / 2020!! In July 2009 BT said it was impossible to get more than 80% of the country on broadband, then in January this year the Digital Britain report said we were all going to get Fast broadband @ 2Mb in 2012, (I can't even get 500kb to my house) Now we're all going to have Super Fast by 2017 (well 90% by 2017 and 100% by 2020)
Well that's pretty good - except that the BT Infinity Service that this relies on is targeting 40% coverage (ie Cities and Metropolitan area) by 2012, and BT's record on delivering things like the 21CN all IP network is pretty poor, so if left to BT it will all be to slow, to late!
In an attempt to speed up the process and with an eye to improved competition the Conservatives are suggesting that BT opens up not just it's exchanges but all of it's trunking and conduits to the likes of Virgin Media, even suggestions now that the NTL Fibre at the top of the village could be broken out and strung from the old GPO telephone pole outside the house.
However the question of funding will almost certainly kill it the 50p tax on landlines is already getting push back and will certainly be an election issue, and the Conservative suggestion of top slicing the BBCs budget by £120m is frankly widdling into the wind, we're talking billions to deliver on any of these promises and no company can afford to raise the amount of long-term debt that would be required.
On the upside opening up the BT trunks would make it easier to run business servics around th Cities which would certainly help and would reduce the number of new digs and roadworks in places like London.
I think the solution is a mixture of public and private investment, with which ever party wins taking the same approach as the Dutch "we will invest in this network and you the service providers can lease the resulting infrastructure from us" If you would like to invest alongside us and own a percentage of the income you're welcome to pitch in"
But note the confusion over dates 2012 / 2017 / 2020!! In July 2009 BT said it was impossible to get more than 80% of the country on broadband, then in January this year the Digital Britain report said we were all going to get Fast broadband @ 2Mb in 2012, (I can't even get 500kb to my house) Now we're all going to have Super Fast by 2017 (well 90% by 2017 and 100% by 2020)
Well that's pretty good - except that the BT Infinity Service that this relies on is targeting 40% coverage (ie Cities and Metropolitan area) by 2012, and BT's record on delivering things like the 21CN all IP network is pretty poor, so if left to BT it will all be to slow, to late!
In an attempt to speed up the process and with an eye to improved competition the Conservatives are suggesting that BT opens up not just it's exchanges but all of it's trunking and conduits to the likes of Virgin Media, even suggestions now that the NTL Fibre at the top of the village could be broken out and strung from the old GPO telephone pole outside the house.
However the question of funding will almost certainly kill it the 50p tax on landlines is already getting push back and will certainly be an election issue, and the Conservative suggestion of top slicing the BBCs budget by £120m is frankly widdling into the wind, we're talking billions to deliver on any of these promises and no company can afford to raise the amount of long-term debt that would be required.
On the upside opening up the BT trunks would make it easier to run business servics around th Cities which would certainly help and would reduce the number of new digs and roadworks in places like London.
I think the solution is a mixture of public and private investment, with which ever party wins taking the same approach as the Dutch "we will invest in this network and you the service providers can lease the resulting infrastructure from us" If you would like to invest alongside us and own a percentage of the income you're welcome to pitch in"
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Fragmented services business makes UK operators takeover targets
As their economy stumbles in and out of recession and the pound weakens against almost everything but the Green-back, the UK telecoms market must look like a great place to pick up bargains if you're a service provider looking to break into the European market.
See this article in Global Telecoms Business that we contributed to recently; complete with diagram showing the fragmented nature of UK IP access market.
If I were TATA, SingTel or China Telecom I would start by acquiring key assets in the UK. Especially where there was access to international submarine cabling.
Why?
For those of you not familiar with the history of UK telecoms: Deregulation in the late 1980's, followed by early adoption of Internet, as an alternative to Frame-Relay or ATM networks, led to tens of billions of $'s being invested in Fiber Networks up and down the country around most major cities by extremely well funded startups. There was also massive investment by the likes of Global Crossing, Verizon, Cable & Wireless and AT&T in sub-marine cabling linking the UK to the US, Europe, the Middle East and Africa
After the euphoria of the 90's tech bubble 'run-riot' abated most of these companies went bust and there assets were acquired for very little from the liquidators, and they've since been run as profitable low overhead.
This has however left the market extremely fragmented with a large amount of highly valuable infrastructure split amongst a myriad of small (in xSP terms). We recently saw a Service Provider in London with a metropolitan fibre network that would probably cost £100m to replace sold for about £7m crazy, but that's UK accounting :0)
But surely this stuff is available in mainland Europe! Well to a lesser extent yes but the UKs regulatory environment is more friendly, I cannot imagine the French or German Governments allowing key national infrastructure to be sold off to foreign companies - whereas the UK seems to positively revel in overseas ownership of utilities. See T-Orange merger
Global Telecoms Business is a good source of markets information - we'd recommend taking a look at their site.
See this article in Global Telecoms Business that we contributed to recently; complete with diagram showing the fragmented nature of UK IP access market.
If I were TATA, SingTel or China Telecom I would start by acquiring key assets in the UK. Especially where there was access to international submarine cabling.
Why?
For those of you not familiar with the history of UK telecoms: Deregulation in the late 1980's, followed by early adoption of Internet, as an alternative to Frame-Relay or ATM networks, led to tens of billions of $'s being invested in Fiber Networks up and down the country around most major cities by extremely well funded startups. There was also massive investment by the likes of Global Crossing, Verizon, Cable & Wireless and AT&T in sub-marine cabling linking the UK to the US, Europe, the Middle East and Africa
After the euphoria of the 90's tech bubble 'run-riot' abated most of these companies went bust and there assets were acquired for very little from the liquidators, and they've since been run as profitable low overhead.
This has however left the market extremely fragmented with a large amount of highly valuable infrastructure split amongst a myriad of small (in xSP terms). We recently saw a Service Provider in London with a metropolitan fibre network that would probably cost £100m to replace sold for about £7m crazy, but that's UK accounting :0)
But surely this stuff is available in mainland Europe! Well to a lesser extent yes but the UKs regulatory environment is more friendly, I cannot imagine the French or German Governments allowing key national infrastructure to be sold off to foreign companies - whereas the UK seems to positively revel in overseas ownership of utilities. See T-Orange merger
Global Telecoms Business is a good source of markets information - we'd recommend taking a look at their site.
Labels:
aquisitions,
BT,
Cable and Wireless,
IP Services,
TATA,
telecommunications
Monday, March 08, 2010
High Speed Broadband - UK Failure to Launch
I was thinking again about the Google'isation of the world, which mostly involves Google giving people stuff that they want for free - and renting their eyeballs out to all comers. I came back to Google City, or what was once called Topeka, Kansas. Google are planning to roll out a a Gigabit Fiber Network for 50,000 homes somewhere in the US - see previous post.
Compare this with the Netherlands and the UK;
In 2003 the City of Amsterdam funded a pilot fibre network to cover 40,000 homes in May 2009 The Amsterdam Fiber Network was expanded to 150,000 homes & businesses in the City. The Dutch Minister responsible for information stating that "...high speed (Gigabit) Internet was a necessity and should be open for all". City of Amsterdam paid for the infrastructure and now makes a profit leasing it to the private sector.
In the UK a vague target of 2mb for all by 2012 set out in the Digital Britain Report is made laughable by no ideas for funding other than a £6 ($10) a year tax on phone lines which they would probably give to BT and will most likely drop as the UK elections loom over a stricken and debt-riven nation.
Hold this in your mind: the UK Gov' considers 10Mbps Broadband to be "Superfast' This short example shows just how far away Digital Britain really is, and how that impacts on the economy.
We have small sub-office just North of Cambridge we decided to run a Business Broadband line in and use it for long term storage and Disaster Recovery. Despite being just 3 miles from a fiber enabled exchange the best speeds achievable were 468Kbps - which BT informed us was above 440Kbps and wa therefore an acceptable speed for a Business Broadband service - On which planet is that speed acceptable??
Come Google and rain down your love on Cambridge - I am sure we can name a College after you!!
Compare this with the Netherlands and the UK;
In 2003 the City of Amsterdam funded a pilot fibre network to cover 40,000 homes in May 2009 The Amsterdam Fiber Network was expanded to 150,000 homes & businesses in the City. The Dutch Minister responsible for information stating that "...high speed (Gigabit) Internet was a necessity and should be open for all". City of Amsterdam paid for the infrastructure and now makes a profit leasing it to the private sector.
In the UK a vague target of 2mb for all by 2012 set out in the Digital Britain Report is made laughable by no ideas for funding other than a £6 ($10) a year tax on phone lines which they would probably give to BT and will most likely drop as the UK elections loom over a stricken and debt-riven nation.
Hold this in your mind: the UK Gov' considers 10Mbps Broadband to be "Superfast' This short example shows just how far away Digital Britain really is, and how that impacts on the economy.
We have small sub-office just North of Cambridge we decided to run a Business Broadband line in and use it for long term storage and Disaster Recovery. Despite being just 3 miles from a fiber enabled exchange the best speeds achievable were 468Kbps - which BT informed us was above 440Kbps and wa therefore an acceptable speed for a Business Broadband service - On which planet is that speed acceptable??
Come Google and rain down your love on Cambridge - I am sure we can name a College after you!!
Labels:
broadband,
BT,
digital britain,
google,
government
Saturday, March 06, 2010
Google, Kansas - Google finally on own maps!!
Topeka, the tiny State Capital of Kansas has renamed itself Google - yep, it's true for a limited time the City of Google will be on the map - I wonder if Redmond, VA might do Microsoft the same honour.
Whilst it may seem frivolous there is a a sound economic reason for doing so, and one that should have every Telco in the developed world sitting up and paying very serious attention. Google is building it's own Gigabit metropolitan fibre networks and Topeka wants it to do that roll out there, and why not? With the initial roll out of 50,000 likely to be a success Google says its target id to roll out to half a million homes across the US.
This is one of the first serious telecoms infrastructure roll outs of the 21st century and it's not being funded by a Telco... Or is it?!
Whilst it may seem frivolous there is a a sound economic reason for doing so, and one that should have every Telco in the developed world sitting up and paying very serious attention. Google is building it's own Gigabit metropolitan fibre networks and Topeka wants it to do that roll out there, and why not? With the initial roll out of 50,000 likely to be a success Google says its target id to roll out to half a million homes across the US.
This is one of the first serious telecoms infrastructure roll outs of the 21st century and it's not being funded by a Telco... Or is it?!
Thursday, February 11, 2010
BT £9m Pension deficit slams stock price
BT unveiled profits from operations up this quarter, mostly off the back of improvements in the group known, or formerly known, as BT Global Services, which is good, yes?! Well no they they also announced a pension deficit of £9Bn, for those of you in Metric that's €10.2Bn or in greenbacks $14Bn. They said they were going into a 17 year recovery plan.
A 17 year recovery plan!! This is a company that has been in recovery since 2001 when it finally figured out that it had a £30bn debt mountain. Whilst smaller atthe time France Telecom and DT where quietly beavering away being modern Telcos BT and their arch rivals CW seemed to lose the plot completely, determinedly launching and relaunching on the International markets, in ever more crazy, expensive and vain-glorious attempts to out AT&T, AT&T.
You have to feel for the current BT management team who will be cleaning up Sir Peter Bonfields mess for another 20 years.
A 17 year recovery plan!! This is a company that has been in recovery since 2001 when it finally figured out that it had a £30bn debt mountain. Whilst smaller atthe time France Telecom and DT where quietly beavering away being modern Telcos BT and their arch rivals CW seemed to lose the plot completely, determinedly launching and relaunching on the International markets, in ever more crazy, expensive and vain-glorious attempts to out AT&T, AT&T.
You have to feel for the current BT management team who will be cleaning up Sir Peter Bonfields mess for another 20 years.
Labels:
9 million,
ATT,
BT,
Cable Wireless,
internet,
IP Services,
O2,
telecommunications,
VoIP
Thursday, December 17, 2009
The Holiday Season Arrives
The Team at BackChannel, the Directors Nick, Andy and I would like to wish you all a Merry Christmas and a peaceful and blessed New Year.
Try JibJab Sendables® eCards today!
Monday, December 14, 2009
Mail Security: Market Growth Stalls in 2009
As we prepare for our end of year reporting and analysis season; some early news is that the BackChannel search engines have identified striking new information on the use of hosted security market.
Over the last few years these services delivered by the likes of market leaders Messagelabs, Postini and MXLogic have seen a 20% CAGR. We now measure overall customer numbers as static.
Despite having seen some of the most valuable/expensive buyouts during recent years; hosted security services are at last starting to feel the pinch.
Messagelabs acquired by Symantec 2008 for $695m
Postini acquired by Google 2007 for $625m
Surfcontrol acquired by Websense 2007 for $400m
Scansafe acquired by Cisco 2009 for $183m
MXLogic acquired by Macafee 2009 for $140m
A lack of uptake by 'new-new' customers has impacted sector growth. There also appears to have been a fair amount of churn amongst the existing install base, as vendors price aggressively for service contract renewals, in what has been pretty much a zerosum game in 2009.
Actual individual services amongst major organisations have dropped 1.5% to 2% depending on the geography and level of local competition. The good news for service providers and their investors is that this is mostly due to organisations consolidating their email domains, so installed base of user seats is holding steady.
Fortunately for the acquiring companies it's less of a downturn in the market, more of a stall and we predict that these figures will start to rise in the latter half of 2010 as confidence returns and the vendors switch tactics. This remains no-brainer technology, economic circumstances don't make it any less so.
In the current climate we believe vendors should be looking at mopping up exercises - pulling in rogue divisions of large customers that have done their own thing. Consolidating is always a good way for a customer to save money, and a supplier to add value.
If you're interested in pricing for the January 2010 Hosted Mail Security Market Report from BackChannel email info@backchannel.co.uk for more details.
Over the last few years these services delivered by the likes of market leaders Messagelabs, Postini and MXLogic have seen a 20% CAGR. We now measure overall customer numbers as static.
Despite having seen some of the most valuable/expensive buyouts during recent years; hosted security services are at last starting to feel the pinch.
Messagelabs acquired by Symantec 2008 for $695m
Postini acquired by Google 2007 for $625m
Surfcontrol acquired by Websense 2007 for $400m
Scansafe acquired by Cisco 2009 for $183m
MXLogic acquired by Macafee 2009 for $140m
A lack of uptake by 'new-new' customers has impacted sector growth. There also appears to have been a fair amount of churn amongst the existing install base, as vendors price aggressively for service contract renewals, in what has been pretty much a zerosum game in 2009.
Actual individual services amongst major organisations have dropped 1.5% to 2% depending on the geography and level of local competition. The good news for service providers and their investors is that this is mostly due to organisations consolidating their email domains, so installed base of user seats is holding steady.
Fortunately for the acquiring companies it's less of a downturn in the market, more of a stall and we predict that these figures will start to rise in the latter half of 2010 as confidence returns and the vendors switch tactics. This remains no-brainer technology, economic circumstances don't make it any less so.
In the current climate we believe vendors should be looking at mopping up exercises - pulling in rogue divisions of large customers that have done their own thing. Consolidating is always a good way for a customer to save money, and a supplier to add value.
If you're interested in pricing for the January 2010 Hosted Mail Security Market Report from BackChannel email info@backchannel.co.uk for more details.
Labels:
2009,
email,
macafee,
managed services,
Market data,
postini,
symantec
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

