Tata Communications 11th hour withdrawal from negotiations with Cable & Wireless Worldwide sent the troubled companies shares into free-fall yesterday and left the way clear for Vodafone to snap up a bit of a bargain.
The estimated breakup value of Cable & Wireless is estimated to be around £2 1/2 billion, approximately £.90 per share. This may have led to the Cable & Wireless board to reject the £.42 a share offer made by Tata. With CW shares standing at £.31 each as I type this, you wonder if they've gained anything.
Over the years of watching the ups and downs and further downs of Cable & Wireless it's often occur to be and my colleagues at Cable & Wireless would be a better fit with British Telecom supporting their increasingly successful BT Global Services organisation.
Here is an interesting if not terribly well-informed article posted on interactive investor on the 16th which goes into rather more details. The comment that Cable & Wireless is the provider of choice for 70 of the FTSE 100 companies is terribly wide of the mark, after years of decline Cable & Wireless is left as one of the many, many, many, providers that service the U.K.'s largest companies. Don't believe the PR spin Cable & Wireless's position amongst these organisations is way behind that of BT Group and Verizon.
Showing posts with label TATA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label TATA. Show all posts
Thursday, April 19, 2012
Wednesday, March 10, 2010
Fragmented services business makes UK operators takeover targets
As their economy stumbles in and out of recession and the pound weakens against almost everything but the Green-back, the UK telecoms market must look like a great place to pick up bargains if you're a service provider looking to break into the European market.
See this article in Global Telecoms Business that we contributed to recently; complete with diagram showing the fragmented nature of UK IP access market.
If I were TATA, SingTel or China Telecom I would start by acquiring key assets in the UK. Especially where there was access to international submarine cabling.
Why?
For those of you not familiar with the history of UK telecoms: Deregulation in the late 1980's, followed by early adoption of Internet, as an alternative to Frame-Relay or ATM networks, led to tens of billions of $'s being invested in Fiber Networks up and down the country around most major cities by extremely well funded startups. There was also massive investment by the likes of Global Crossing, Verizon, Cable & Wireless and AT&T in sub-marine cabling linking the UK to the US, Europe, the Middle East and Africa
After the euphoria of the 90's tech bubble 'run-riot' abated most of these companies went bust and there assets were acquired for very little from the liquidators, and they've since been run as profitable low overhead.
This has however left the market extremely fragmented with a large amount of highly valuable infrastructure split amongst a myriad of small (in xSP terms). We recently saw a Service Provider in London with a metropolitan fibre network that would probably cost £100m to replace sold for about £7m crazy, but that's UK accounting :0)
But surely this stuff is available in mainland Europe! Well to a lesser extent yes but the UKs regulatory environment is more friendly, I cannot imagine the French or German Governments allowing key national infrastructure to be sold off to foreign companies - whereas the UK seems to positively revel in overseas ownership of utilities. See T-Orange merger
Global Telecoms Business is a good source of markets information - we'd recommend taking a look at their site.
See this article in Global Telecoms Business that we contributed to recently; complete with diagram showing the fragmented nature of UK IP access market.
If I were TATA, SingTel or China Telecom I would start by acquiring key assets in the UK. Especially where there was access to international submarine cabling.
Why?
For those of you not familiar with the history of UK telecoms: Deregulation in the late 1980's, followed by early adoption of Internet, as an alternative to Frame-Relay or ATM networks, led to tens of billions of $'s being invested in Fiber Networks up and down the country around most major cities by extremely well funded startups. There was also massive investment by the likes of Global Crossing, Verizon, Cable & Wireless and AT&T in sub-marine cabling linking the UK to the US, Europe, the Middle East and Africa
After the euphoria of the 90's tech bubble 'run-riot' abated most of these companies went bust and there assets were acquired for very little from the liquidators, and they've since been run as profitable low overhead.
This has however left the market extremely fragmented with a large amount of highly valuable infrastructure split amongst a myriad of small (in xSP terms). We recently saw a Service Provider in London with a metropolitan fibre network that would probably cost £100m to replace sold for about £7m crazy, but that's UK accounting :0)
But surely this stuff is available in mainland Europe! Well to a lesser extent yes but the UKs regulatory environment is more friendly, I cannot imagine the French or German Governments allowing key national infrastructure to be sold off to foreign companies - whereas the UK seems to positively revel in overseas ownership of utilities. See T-Orange merger
Global Telecoms Business is a good source of markets information - we'd recommend taking a look at their site.
Labels:
aquisitions,
BT,
Cable and Wireless,
IP Services,
TATA,
telecommunications
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Sub-sea Cabling Map
I spent an hour sorting out various service providers network maps this afternoon, and found this one that is rather good.
Global Submarine Cable Map 2007
In a world that is becoming more IT dependent it highlights the lack of redundancy in the global network of sub-sea cabling.
Global Submarine Cable Map 2007
In a world that is becoming more IT dependent it highlights the lack of redundancy in the global network of sub-sea cabling.
Friday, May 30, 2008
Rely on Emerging Markets Players...
... to make Telco world interesting again.
So Vanco is to be acquired by Reliance Globalcom the highly successful telecommunications and services company based out of Mumbai, India.
Reliance is a conglomeration of three companies: Flag Telecom, Yipes Communications, and the original Reliance Communications.
So Vanco is to be acquired by Reliance Globalcom the highly successful telecommunications and services company based out of Mumbai, India.
Reliance is a conglomeration of three companies: Flag Telecom, Yipes Communications, and the original Reliance Communications.
The VANCO acquisition establishes credible base of customers for Reliance in Europe. Flag provides a global network of undersea optical cabling; Yipes, managed carrier Ethernet services (including VPLS) and Reliance's experience of building its India-wide network of wireless and wired services, including large scale MPLS deployments, sets it in good sted for an assault on the European markets.
Reliance joins TATA Communications amongst the Indian Companies who are taking the experience of building infrastructure and supporting western service providers, and who are now determined to play on the world stage.
Labels:
IP Services,
Reliance Communications,
TATA,
VANCO
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)